[Nfd-dev] Signed Interest processing: alternate to stop-and-wait

[Marc.Mosko at parc.com]

I think if a protocol needs serialized commands, it should have its own serial number and not confound protocols by using a field from a different area of concern.  For example, if you change signing algorithms that use a different mechanism, will that break your protocol?

I think the signing algorithm and verification should use its own mechanism.  Other protocols should not peek in to there for their properties. For example, some system might ditch the existing signature and put a new signature on there.  That should not change your protocol’s behavior.

Marc

On Feb 23, 2015, at 9:50 AM, Mark Stapp <mjs at cisco.com<mailto:mjs at cisco.com>> wrote:

it

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/nfd-dev/attachments/20150223/755df666/attachment.html>