[Nfd-dev] NDN vs IPv17

[Junxiao Shi]

Dear folks

I believe the goal is different.

IPv17, according to the tweet, is to increase network speed, while the
narrow waist is still based on host addresses.
NDN is designed to be a distribution network, which changes the narrow
waist to "content chunks", so that application does not need to map the
*what* users care about to the *where* used in network.

Yours, Junxiao

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Simon Edelhaus <edelhas at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:30 PM
Subject: Fwd: [Nfd-dev] Mini NDN with NDN Traffic Generator
To: Junxiao Shi <shijunxiao at email.arizona.edu>

On Jul 15, 2015, at 12:53 PM, Simon Edelhaus <edelhas at gmail.com> wrote:

Yes. That is the one.


it is difficult to comparison if we dont know know how IPv17 works


> first time hearing IPv17: is this the right pointer (returned by
> google)  to it ?
> https://twitter.com/startupbranding/status/601401104547610624
>
> since it is called IPv17, supposedly it still based IP addresses?
>
>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Junxiao Shi <shijunxiao at email.arizona.edu>
wrote:

> Hi Simon
>
> I'm unaware about IPv17. I didn't find a relevant Internet Draft or
> Internet Standard in IETF.org.
> Can you post a citation?
>
> Yours, Junxiao
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Simon Edelhaus <edelhas at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All!
>>
>> How would you guys compare NDN initiative to something like IPv17 ?
>>
>> Is there  a slide deck comparing the 2 approaches?
>>
>>
>> -- ttfn
>> Simon Edelhaus
>> California 2015
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/nfd-dev/attachments/20150715/8a02f105/attachment.html>