[Nfd-dev] jNDN SegmentFetcher

[Thompson, Jeff]

Hi Davide,

Thanks for the clarification. So, we¹ll merge the pull requests for AIMD
into jNDN and Cubic pipeline into NDN-JS. Then we can look to eventually
updating all libraries to cubic. Does that sound right?

Thanks,
- Jeff T

On 2019/6/4, 10:29:14, "Davide Pesavento" <davidepesa at gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi Jeff,
>
>AIMD was the original adaptive pipeline implemented in ndncatchunks,
>later ported to ndn-cxx's SegmentFetcher. More recently, Klaus
>implemented a Cubic-like window adaptation algorithm in ndncatchunks
>and made it the default since it was shown to perform better than the
>original AIMD. We should port Cubic to ndn-cxx as well, but so far
>nobody has done that (there are a few other things in the API of
>SegmentFetcher that I dislike, but that's a separate topic).
>
>Adding *both* AIMD and Cubic to the CCL libraries makes little sense
>to me. Cubic should be preferred for new implementations.
>
>Davide
>
>On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 12:53 PM Thompson, Jeff <jefft0 at remap.ucla.edu>
>wrote:
>>
>> This is a pull request for the jNDN segment fetcher for ³aimd". There
>>is a different pull request for the NDN-JS segment fetcher for ³cubic
>>pipeline².
>> https://github.com/named-data/ndn-js/pull/72
>>
>> What is the relationship between aimd and cubic pipeline. Should aimd
>>be ported from jNDN to NDN-JS and PyNDN, etc. ? Should it replace the
>>cubic pipeline in NDN-JS, or be added in addition to it?
>>
>> - Jeff T
>>
>> From: Nfd-dev <nfd-dev-bounces at lists.cs.ucla.edu> on behalf of nfd-dev
>><nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu>
>> Reply-To: Ritik kumar <ritikkne at gmail.com>
>> Date: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 at 5:31:00
>> To: nfd-dev <nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu>
>> Subject: [Nfd-dev] jNDN SegmentFetcher
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I recently made a pull request to the jNDN repo containing code to
>>provide AIMD pipelining support to the SegmentFetcher in the library. I
>>have written a simple unit test along with it too. The link to the pull
>>request:
>> https://github.com/named-data/jndn/pull/24
>>
>> The Java SegmentFetcher used in the test is available here:
>> 
>>https://github.com/dev-ritik/jndn/blob/aimd_pipelining/src/net/named_data
>>/jndn/util/SegmentFetcher.java
>>
>> I ran a series of experiments on AIMD as well as fixed fetcher among
>>the jNDN and the chunks utilities and the results I found can be found
>>here,
>>  
>>https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1I11AvNxdttPvftFzk0DF_G650LGNkjGsK
>>21mcumsysU/edit?usp=sharing
>> The commands used are also included in the link above.
>>
>> The java class and other parameters used in the test can be found here,
>> https://gist.github.com/dev-ritik/6a35a04c473affbc754a2c76142a02e0
>>
>> Please review the changes made so that I could improve it as required.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ritik Kumar
>>
>> GSoC student developer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nfd-dev mailing list
>> Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu
>> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev