[Nfd-dev] Network Nack Usage

[Lixia Zhang]

> On May 3, 2016, at 8:58 AM, Brown, Andrew <andrew.brown at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> All,
>  
> Is anyone using the different NACK codes to alter the flow of their application?

there could be different ways to interpret the question:

1/ how applications use different NACK codes to alter the "data flow"
e.g. Ilya (copied him here) used application NACK to tell consumers to wait for a specific time period when data is not ready

2/ how network layer (NFD) use different NACKs to alter the paths of dat flows
(as Alex mentioned)

> I am looking at https://github.com/named-data/jndn/commit/f0a50c635afe0cbd27cc84e188b582eb7e457b9b#diff-e12e36065baf92aa80b384cbfb3eef02R35 <https://github.com/named-data/jndn/commit/f0a50c635afe0cbd27cc84e188b582eb7e457b9b#diff-e12e36065baf92aa80b384cbfb3eef02R35> and was interested in finding out the different actions others are taking: obviously log in all cases, wait and re-send for congestion, fail and throw for no route, ___ for duplicate?
>  
> Sincerely,
>  
> Andrew Brown
> IoTG Strategy and Integrated Products
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Nfd-dev mailing list
> Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu <mailto:Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu>
> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/nfd-dev/attachments/20160503/54e9a634/attachment.html>