[Nfd-dev] in-record deletion

Junxiao Shi shijunxiao at email.arizona.edu
Thu Nov 6 02:36:37 PST 2014


Hi Naren

It is correct to delete the in-record according to the LAST incoming
Interest from a face.
The downstream is supposed to send us an Interest with InterestLifetime set
to the longest lifetime its downstreams want the content.

Yours, Junxiao
On Nov 5, 2014 11:54 PM, "NAREN N" <nnaren1902 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> In section 3.3.1 of the newly published NFD Developers Guide, it is said
> and I quote
>
> >"An in-record expires when InterestLifetime has elapsed after the last
> Interest packet arrives."
>
> This is applicable only as of today because each interest packet has the
> same Life time. Suppose say a previously arrived packet from a face(Not the
> last arriving packet) has a bigger InterestLifetime, it would be wrong to
> delete the Face entry when the last packets InterestLifetime expires right?
>
> I hope it is clear to everyone.
>
> regards,
> Naren
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nfd-dev mailing list
> Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu
> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/nfd-dev/attachments/20141106/d949f99b/attachment.html>


More information about the Nfd-dev mailing list