[Nfd-dev] Interest lifetime limit

[Giovanni Pau]

I would not bound it in this way is not better to express it as a 2 byte in seconds so we have the flexibility for future applications?

/g. 
==========================
It had long since come to my attention that people of accomplishment rarely sat back and let things happen to them. They went out and happened to things. 

- Leonardo da Vinci 
==========================




On Mar 20, 2014, at 7:48 PM, Lixia Zhang <lixia at cs.ucla.edu> wrote:

> 
> On Mar 20, 2014, at 5:04 PM, Alex Afanasyev <alexander.afanasyev at ucla.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Why this specific value?  Can we just have something like a minute or so?
> 
> as far as I can tell, it is 2^15, i.e. positive integer for a 2-byte value
> (32sec, not too far from 1 min :-)
> 
> 
>> 
>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Junxiao Shi <shijunxiao at email.arizona.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> A practical upper bound for InterestLifetime is necessary. I suggest a value around 32768ms.
>>> 
>>> If an Interest has InterestLifetime larger than the upper bound, incoming Interest pipeline should set this field to the upper bound. Subsequent processing, including what is sent out, behaves as if InterestLifetime equals the upper bound.
>>> 
>>> Yours, Junxiao
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nfd-dev mailing list
>>> Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu
>>> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nfd-dev mailing list
>> Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu
>> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nfd-dev mailing list
> Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu
> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev