[ndnSIM] Simulation halts with small lifetime of interest

sangita...... sangita.engg at gmail.com
Wed Sep 15 13:33:47 PDT 2021


Hi Karan,
Thanks for the reply.

 I kept the lifetime as 10 seconds. Your words are true that my interest
are not reaching to any producer (destination) but as per my understanding
that should not halt the simulation in the midway. When a interest will not
reach to any producer , time out will happen and pit entry for those
intereste will be evicted.

Do you have a clear idea what actually happened when a time out take place
?

Thanks and regards,
Sangita

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021, 20:47 Karan Raj Baruah via ndnSIM <
ndnsim at lists.cs.ucla.edu> wrote:

> Hello Sangita,
>
> How much is the value of lifetime that you set when causing the issues?
> Also, when you set the lifetime manually can you verify from your tracer
> logs that the packets are actually sent(and duration for interest to
> reach)? It might be because latency between ports is too high that when you
> change it the interest may not reach the destination at all(even on
> retransmission).
>
> Best,
> Karan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, 16 September, 2021, 12:30:08 am IST,
> ndnsim-request at lists.cs.ucla.edu <ndnsim-request at lists.cs.ucla.edu>
> wrote:
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:11:04 +0100
> From: "sangita......" <sangita.engg at gmail.com>
> To: ndnsim at lists.cs.ucla.edu
> Subject: [ndnSIM] Simulation halts with small lifetime of interest
> Message-ID:
>     <CALbsVCFQgTWn9VaK8sW-n1ftoGZ+s4t7URoV9r9F7j_HemJMqw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dear members,
> I am developing a vehicular network by incorporating sumo in ndnsim using
> the traci client.
> In my simulation the consumer generates interest in some zipf-mandelbroute
> fashion. Whenever I am keeping life time of each interest smaller than the
> total simulation time, somewhere my simulation halts with the below
> message:
> Error: tcpip::Socket::recvAndCheck @ recv: peer shutdown
> Quitting (on error).
>
> However, it runs fine when I keep the lifetime of each interest bigger than
> the total simulation time.
>
> Can anyone give me any clue on what can be the problem?
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/ndnsim/attachments/20210915/5df3373e/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> ndnSIM mailing list
> ndnSIM at lists.cs.ucla.edu
> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/ndnsim
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of ndnSIM Digest, Vol 106, Issue 7
> **************************************
> _______________________________________________
> ndnSIM mailing list
> ndnSIM at lists.cs.ucla.edu
> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/ndnsim
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/ndnsim/attachments/20210915/7ab171b1/attachment.html>


More information about the ndnSIM mailing list