[ndnSIM] ndn cache replace policy

Spyridon (Spyros) Mastorakis mastorakis at CS.UCLA.EDU
Thu Dec 22 23:02:53 PST 2016


personally, I feel it would be easier for you to use the CS of NFD. 

You will have to create your own class that will derive from the Policy class of NFD.

Hope that this helps.
Spyridon (Spyros) Mastorakis
Personal Website: http://cs.ucla.edu/~mastorakis/ <http://cs.ucla.edu/~mastorakis/>
Internet Research Laboratory
Computer Science Department

> On Dec 22, 2016, at 5:20 PM, gc199211 <gc199211 at mail.ustc.edu.cn> wrote:
> Hello :
>   I am trying to realize a cache replacement policy on ndnSIM .The new policy is based on lfu policy.  According to the api document I found that
>  1)  The ns3::ndn::ContentStore has realized lfu policy , but the code is quite complex,including trie.hpp、tire-with-policy.hpp、lfu-policy.hpp and so on
> 2)  The nfd::cs::Cs  hasn't realized lfu policy,but the code seems easier.
> So which kind of contentstore is easier to realize my policy,   ns3::ndn::ContentStore or nfd::cs::Cs  ?And how to  realize a cache replacement policy,Think you very much!
> 2016-12-22
> gc199211

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/ndnsim/attachments/20161223/17b65345/attachment.html>

More information about the ndnSIM mailing list