[ndnSIM] ndnSIM Performance

[Hisham Farahat]

One more thing.
Why python2.7 is taking ~20%?


On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Hisham Farahat <hishamfarahat at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
> Yeah, I run my code in optimized mode.
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Alex Afanasyev <
> alexander.afanasyev at ucla.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi Hisham,
>>
>> I hope you’re compiling and running code in optimized mode (./waf
>> configure -d optimized).
>>
>> In optimized mode, ~Ptr() should just decrement a counter, in debug mode
>> there could be more complex things happening, though I’m not sure why would
>> it take 50% of time.
>>
>> —
>> Alex
>>
>> > On May 2, 2015, at 6:59 PM, Hisham Farahat <hishamfarahat at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> > I'm trying to profile ndnSIM 1.0, because My simulation scenarios are
>> taking too long to finish. This was the results:
>> > CPU: Intel Sandy Bridge microarchitecture, speed 3800 MHz (estimated)
>> > Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Clock cycles when not halted) with a
>> unit mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 100000
>> > samples  %        app name                 symbol name
>> > 610808   49.4017  ndn         ns3::Ptr<ns3::ndn::Face>::~Ptr()
>> > 268401   21.7081  python2.7                /usr/bin/python2.7
>> > 107633    8.7053  ndn        ns3::Ptr<ns3::Packet>::~Ptr()
>> > 76617     6.1967  ndn         ns3::Ptr<ns3::Packet const>::~Ptr()
>> > 23462     1.8976  ndn         ns3::Ptr<ns3::ndn::Interest const>::~Ptr()
>> > .....
>> >
>> > is this normal? 50% on ~Ptr() ?
>> > Am i doing something wrong?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Hisham Farahat
>



-- 
Hisham Farahat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/ndnsim/attachments/20150603/012bd3e2/attachment.html>