[ndnSIM] ndnSIM Performance
Hisham Farahat
hishamfarahat at gmail.com
Wed Jun 3 19:28:56 PDT 2015
Hi,
Yeah, I run my code in optimized mode.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Alex Afanasyev <
alexander.afanasyev at ucla.edu> wrote:
> Hi Hisham,
>
> I hope you’re compiling and running code in optimized mode (./waf
> configure -d optimized).
>
> In optimized mode, ~Ptr() should just decrement a counter, in debug mode
> there could be more complex things happening, though I’m not sure why would
> it take 50% of time.
>
> —
> Alex
>
> > On May 2, 2015, at 6:59 PM, Hisham Farahat <hishamfarahat at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm trying to profile ndnSIM 1.0, because My simulation scenarios are
> taking too long to finish. This was the results:
> > CPU: Intel Sandy Bridge microarchitecture, speed 3800 MHz (estimated)
> > Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Clock cycles when not halted) with a
> unit mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 100000
> > samples % app name symbol name
> > 610808 49.4017 ndn ns3::Ptr<ns3::ndn::Face>::~Ptr()
> > 268401 21.7081 python2.7 /usr/bin/python2.7
> > 107633 8.7053 ndn ns3::Ptr<ns3::Packet>::~Ptr()
> > 76617 6.1967 ndn ns3::Ptr<ns3::Packet const>::~Ptr()
> > 23462 1.8976 ndn ns3::Ptr<ns3::ndn::Interest const>::~Ptr()
> > .....
> >
> > is this normal? 50% on ~Ptr() ?
> > Am i doing something wrong?
> >
> > Regards,
>
>
--
Hisham Farahat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/ndnsim/attachments/20150603/64c062b6/attachment.html>
More information about the ndnSIM
mailing list