[Ndn-interest] NDN Stack

Klaus Schneider klaus at cs.arizona.edu
Mon Aug 5 18:56:33 PDT 2019



On 8/5/19 3:07 PM, Ahmed BENMOUSSA wrote:
> Hello Klaus,
> Thank you for your response.
> 
> These two papers used the above-mentioned stack:
> 
> *NDN Host Model*: https://named-data.net/publications/sigcomm-ccr-final221/

Note that the first one has the transport layer grayed out and explains 
"transport functions are implemented in system libraries used by 
applications".


> *DDoS mitigation by FITT in NDN*: 
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331343472_Expect_More_from_the_Networking_DDoS_Mitigation_by_FITT_in_Named_Data_Networking
> 
> Best regards,
> Ahmed B.
> 
> 
> Le lun. 5 août 2019 à 23:15, Klaus Schneider <klaus at cs.arizona.edu 
> <mailto:klaus at cs.arizona.edu>> a écrit :
> 
> 
> 
>     On 8/5/19 1:33 PM, Ahmed BENMOUSSA wrote:
>      > Hello everyone,
>      >
>      > I am sending you to ask about the NDN stack.
>      > In some papers, researchers include a "/Transport/" layer to the NDN
>      > stack as follows:
>      > ======================
>      > \ *Application */
>      >   +--------------------------------------+
>      >    \ *Transport */
>      >     +----------------------------------+
>      >       \ *NDN */
>      >        +-----------------------------+
>      >       / *Link-layer*      \
>      >     +----------------------------------+
>      >    / *Physical* \
>      >    =====================
>      >
>      > Other researches don't include it in their papers.
>      >
>      > My question is: What is the role of the "/Transport/" layer in
>     this case?
>      > Knowing that the "Link-layer" includes any communication protocol
>     that
>      > NDN could use as a tunnel to send and receive traffic, why a
>      > "/Transport/" layer is added?
> 
>     Also, I think this question can be answered with pure IP network logic:
>     Tunnels can only provide point-to-point reliability between NDN nodes.
>     But many applications need end-to-end reliability. Hence, the need
>     for a
>     transport layer (or similar functionality, i.e. ARQ, at the consumer).
> 
>     Best regards,
>     Klaus
> 
> 
>      >
>      > Is this layer added to support future NDN deployment? (When
>     native NDN
>      > communications are used instead of IP overlays). Or does it have
>     other
>      > roles?
>      >
>      > What NDN stack should I consider in my papers and presentations?
>     (with
>      > or without the Transport layer).
>      >
>      > Thank you in advance.
>      >
>      > Kind regards,
>      > Ahmed. B.
>      >
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > Ndn-interest mailing list
>      > Ndn-interest at lists.cs.ucla.edu
>     <mailto:Ndn-interest at lists.cs.ucla.edu>
>      > http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/ndn-interest
>      >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ndn-interest mailing list
> Ndn-interest at lists.cs.ucla.edu
> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/ndn-interest
> 


More information about the Ndn-interest mailing list