[Ndn-interest] NDN protocol principles: no privacy?
gts at ics.uci.edu
Sat Mar 12 14:30:11 PST 2016
I'm a huge fan of privacy and a lot of my research privacy-related.
But, I can't define "privacy". I wonder if anyone can do it precisely
Might be because it's an amorphous and fluid notion.
Perhaps if NDN folks were to include *privacy* as one of their guiding
it'd be like a stereotypical beauty pageant contestant who,
when asked about her (or his?) ideals, comes up with something
like: "Peace on Earth"?
On a less serious note, whenever I see things like codified "principles"
(a notion similar to "commandments"), I can't help but think of a new
or a new cult being started.
Chancellor's Professor of Computer Science
University of California, Irvine
On 3/12/16 6:58 AM, Mark Stapp wrote:
> I had many questions as I first read the list of "six principles" that
> Alex shared this week. One question was about the issue of privacy. I
> was somewhat surprised to see nothing in the top-six list about
> exposure of user activities on the internet, or about establishing a
> privacy baseline for the NDN architecture. Given the current level of
> intense and broad interest in the issues of passive observation and
> personal data collection, it seems to me that that topic deserves a
> statement of "principle". I'd like to suggest that there be an
> unambiguous statement that NDN will establish a level of communication
> privacy that uses state-of-the-art cryptography as the default.
> I understand that some of the exposure and correlation issues we
> experience currently arise from existing application protocols. HTTP
> can be used for activity-tracking and correlating whether or not TLS
> is in use, for example. A statement of principle seems like a useful
> way to guide development of both NDN transport features and NDN
> At the same time, if NDN has decided that it will not establish a
> private-by-default baseline, I think that deserves some justification.
> It's clear from our experience using the IP internet that without
> default settings that are privacy-preserving, individuals will
> continue to be vulnerable.
> Ndn-interest mailing list
> Ndn-interest at lists.cs.ucla.edu
More information about the Ndn-interest