[Ndn-interest] How sending an interest for each chunk is justified?

Zeinab Zali zeinabzali at gmail.com
Thu Jul 7 10:45:57 PDT 2016


Dear professor Zhang,

Thanks a lot for your instant reply. Yes you got my intention and explained
the reply perfectly.

"You must know that a TCP connection also has packets going both
directions, for the same purpose.  There is no attempt to
reduce TCP ack overhead by making TCP Ack to work on a file granularity."

This explanation justified me.

Best,

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Lixia Zhang <lixia at cs.ucla.edu> wrote:

>
> On Jul 7, 2016, at 6:41 AM, Zeinab Zali <zeinabzali at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> There is a serious question in my mind about NDN architecture and method.
> Is sending *an interest for each chunk *is efficient? In this way, for a
> large file lots of interest should be sent with all the security and
> communication (or even may be routing and forwarding) overhead. How It is
> justified? Is there a discussion in the literature about it?
>
>
> Dear Zeinab,
>
> thanks for bringing up the question. I tried to fully understand it before
> commenting: you asked:
>     "Is sending *an interest for each chunk *is efficient?"
> this implies to me that you worry about sending more interest packets than
> necessary -- is that right?
>
> If so,
> - keen in mind we are talking about a network layer protocol here (network
> packet must have a MTU size that prevents a single packet blocking others
> for too long)
> - one of the many functions that interest-data exchange provides is loss
> recovery
> - if one sent an interest per big file, wouldn't that make the whole file
> as the unit of loss recovery?  Would that be efficient?
>
> Lixia
> PS: You must know that a TCP connection also has packets going both
> directions, for the same purpose.  There is no attempt to reduce TCP ack
> overhead by making TCP Ack to work on a file granularity.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/ndn-interest/attachments/20160707/1dbb472d/attachment.html>


More information about the Ndn-interest mailing list