[Ndn-interest] NDNVideo: Available over NFD?

Alex Afanasyev alexander.afanasyev at ucla.edu
Sun Mar 29 17:24:21 PDT 2015

In my opinion, cut-through forwarding of segments is a possible optimization of hop-by-hop fragmentation which can be applied only for some of the data packets: only those that are not requested with security constraints (e.g., when neither interest name doesn’t contain implicit digest nor interest doesn’t include data packet signature constraint).  Also, cut-through optimization is meaningful when router connect networks with similar (same) MTU characteristics.


> On Mar 29, 2015, at 4:28 PM, GTS <gts at ics.uci.edu> wrote:
> I disagree with the categorical statement below. Hop-by-hop
> fragmentation is indeed an option for NDN, but it's *not* the only one.
> One way to do secure cut-through (end-based and intermediate)
> (re-)fragmentation is described here:
> http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2861 <http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2861>
> Gene
> On 3/29/15 5:23 PM, Alex Afanasyev wrote:
>>> ....
>>> maybe a typo?
>>> that ought to be/really means “hop-by-hop fragmentation and reassembly”
>> yes. this is a typo that we didn’t catch before.  The conclusion meant to highlight that *hop-by-hop* fragmentation is the only viable option for NDN.
>>>> A

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/ndn-interest/attachments/20150329/fa4edac8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/ndn-interest/attachments/20150329/fa4edac8/attachment.bin>

More information about the Ndn-interest mailing list