[Ndn-interest] NACKs in ICN

[GTS]

Mark:

is there a paper or presentation describing your 5 alternatives?

BTW: as you probably noticed, our paper concerns only network-layer NACKs.
We make no judgement about higher-layer NACKs.

Cheers,
Gene


On 3/10/15 7:15 AM, Mark Stapp wrote:
> Thanks for sending this around, Cesar. It's certainly good to see some 
> details confirming the intuition that it would be costly for producers 
> to try to use public-key operations on adversary-selected inputs as a 
> means of denial-of-existence. but ... the paper doesn't explore many 
> alternative schemes - we presented five, I think, at the last icnrg 
> meeting. the conclusion of the paper - that NACKs have security 
> problems - seems a little strong, based on the small number of 
> approaches considered.
>
> It would be very interesting to see whether your analytical tools 
> might be able to be applied to some of the other approaches.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> On 3/9/15 9:14 PM, Cesar Ghali wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Some of you might be interested in the following report:
>>
>> A. Compagno, M. Conti, C. Ghali, G. Tsudik,
>> To NACK or not to NACK? Negative Acknowledgments in Information-Centric
>> Networking,
>> arXiv: 1503.02123, March 7, 2015.
>> URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1503.02123v1.pdf
>>
>> Of course, comments are appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cesar
>>
>> -- 
>> PGP Key: http://www.cesarghali.info/contact.html
>> PGP Key ID: 0x455D8052
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ndn-interest mailing list
>> Ndn-interest at lists.cs.ucla.edu
>> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/ndn-interest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ndn-interest mailing list
> Ndn-interest at lists.cs.ucla.edu
> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/ndn-interest
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/ndn-interest/attachments/20150310/dd1502fc/attachment.html>