[Nfd-dev] nfdc implicit face creation problems

[Alex Afanasyev]

> On Jan 31, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Junxiao Shi <shijunxiao at email.arizona.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alex 
> 
>> Under the new proposal, nfdc route add command accepts FaceUri and uses that to query an existing face. This should not be considered "inter-command dependency", because the operator can simply run "nfdc face create udp://hobo.cs.arizona.edu <http://hobo.cs.arizona.edu/> && nfdc route add / udp://hobo.cs.arizona.edu <http://hobo.cs.arizona.edu/>" without scraping the output of the first subcommand.
> 
> I that case, I don't understand what the question/proposal is really about.  Remove faceUri handling for unregister?  unregister doesn't support faceUri (per man page) already.
> 
> The proposal is about:
> FaceUri is accepted in most places where FaceId is accepted, including but not limited to nfdc face destroy, nfdc route add, nfdc route remove.
> In these commands, FaceUri can only reference an existing face (via faces/query operation), it cannot implicitly create a new face.
> Also, old nfdc register command will remain unchanged until its removal.


Ok. Sorry for my misunderstanding.  I have no objections for the above proposal and support it.

--
Alex

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/nfd-dev/attachments/20170131/1b0e952b/attachment.html>