[Nfd-dev] review request: NDNLPv2 NACK, Fragmentation, LocalControlHeader

Junxiao Shi shijunxiao at email.arizona.edu
Tue May 26 09:17:15 PDT 2015


Hi Marc

The byte ranges [0:1400], [1400:2800], [2800:4200], [4200:5000] are correct.
Subscripts are to be interpreted in the same way as Python does.

In your suggested ranges, the last range [4200:5000] is Python notation,
but the other three ranges are inconsistent with the last.

Yours, Junxiao

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:18 AM, <Marc.Mosko at parc.com> wrote:

>  In these examples, would the byte ranges not be [0:1399], [1400:2799],
> [2800:4199], [4200:5000]?
>
>  Marc
>
>  +-------------+-------------+    +-------------+-------------+
> | NDNLPv2     | Fragment    |    | NDNLPv2     | Fragment    |
> | seq=8801    |             |    | seq=8802    |             |
> | FragIndex=0 | [0:1400]    |    | FragIndex=1 | [1400:2800] |
> | FragCount=4 |             |    | FragCount=4 |             |
> +-------------+-------------+    +-------------+-------------+
>
> +-------------+-------------+    +-------------+-------------+
> | NDNLPv2     | Fragment    |    | NDNLPv2     | Fragment    |
> | seq=8803    |             |    | seq=8804    |             |
> | FragIndex=2 | [2800:4200] |    | FragIndex=3 | [4200:5000] |
> | FragCount=4 |             |    | FragCount=4 |             |
> +-------------+-------------+    +-------------+-------------+
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/nfd-dev/attachments/20150526/afc544fe/attachment.html>


More information about the Nfd-dev mailing list