[Nfd-dev] review request: NDNLPv2 NACK, Fragmentation, LocalControlHeader
Junxiao Shi
shijunxiao at email.arizona.edu
Tue May 26 09:17:15 PDT 2015
Hi Marc
The byte ranges [0:1400], [1400:2800], [2800:4200], [4200:5000] are correct.
Subscripts are to be interpreted in the same way as Python does.
In your suggested ranges, the last range [4200:5000] is Python notation,
but the other three ranges are inconsistent with the last.
Yours, Junxiao
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:18 AM, <Marc.Mosko at parc.com> wrote:
> In these examples, would the byte ranges not be [0:1399], [1400:2799],
> [2800:4199], [4200:5000]?
>
> Marc
>
> +-------------+-------------+ +-------------+-------------+
> | NDNLPv2 | Fragment | | NDNLPv2 | Fragment |
> | seq=8801 | | | seq=8802 | |
> | FragIndex=0 | [0:1400] | | FragIndex=1 | [1400:2800] |
> | FragCount=4 | | | FragCount=4 | |
> +-------------+-------------+ +-------------+-------------+
>
> +-------------+-------------+ +-------------+-------------+
> | NDNLPv2 | Fragment | | NDNLPv2 | Fragment |
> | seq=8803 | | | seq=8804 | |
> | FragIndex=2 | [2800:4200] | | FragIndex=3 | [4200:5000] |
> | FragCount=4 | | | FragCount=4 | |
> +-------------+-------------+ +-------------+-------------+
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/nfd-dev/attachments/20150526/afc544fe/attachment.html>
More information about the Nfd-dev
mailing list