[Nfd-dev] Naming conventions (draft 3)

[Davide Pesavento]

Hi Alex,

Thanks for the new draft.

*) 3.3 suggests using a timestamp as "a simple way to implement
versioning", which sounds odd to me, why not using the timestamp
marker 0xFC in such cases then?

*) In 3.4, the value for the timestamp is in milliseconds. Can we
change it to microseconds? Applications that don't need this
granularity can just append zeros as needed.

*) In 3.4, typo "cane" -> "can"

*) Why is sequencing a sub-section of timestamping?

Thanks,
Davide

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Alex Afanasyev
<alexander.afanasyev at ucla.edu> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I made an update of the naming convention spec based on the received feedback. The updated draft can be downloaded here: http://redmine.named-data.net/attachments/download/123/convention.pdf
>
> - Version is redefined to be just a number (larger number represents later version and it is up to the app to define the specific use)
> - New marker for Timestamp
>
> Please comment as we need to have this document approved before we can finalize our release.
>
> ---
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> Nfd-dev mailing list
> Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu
> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev