[Nfd-dev] NFD call 20181031

[Lixia Zhang]

> On Oct 31, 2018, at 12:50 PM, Lixia Zhang <lixia at cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
> 
> I'd like to inject the following discussion item for today's call:
> a question from Peter (let me know if I got any detail wrong)
> 
>       NDN-RTC
>       producer       repo
>          |             |
> ------------------------------switched Ethernet
>              |
>           consumer
> 
> each of the above boxes has an ethernet face
> repo fetches and saves NDN-RTC stream
> consumer fetches historical data from repo first, at twice the speed of NDN RTC production rate, so eventually catch up with the real time production.
> 
> producer has limited buffering, so one can see 3 phases:
> 
>       phase-1         phase-2                   phase-3
> data in repo only | data in repo & producer | data from producer
> 
> Q1: how best should the consumer use the Ethernet face (it needs to figure out whose MAC address to use for Interest packet, or it should use Ethernet mcast)
> 
> Q2: one can also model the process as having 2 phases only--ideally as soon as the consumer catches up with producer, the producer should mcast the data packet, that goes to both consumer and repo.  how to implement this?
> 
> 
> 
>> On Oct 31, 2018, at 8:00 AM, NFD call notification <nfd-call-notification at mail1.yoursunny.com <mailto:nfd-call-notification at mail1.yoursunny.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear folks
>> 
>> This is a reminder of the upcoming NFD call using Bluejeans https://bluejeans.com/505221277 <https://bluejeans.com/505221277>. The current call time is every Monday and Wednesday 16:00-17:00 CDT. The current agenda includes the following issues:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> https://gerrit.named-data.net/#/c/ndn-cxx/+/4876/ <https://www.google.com/url?q=https://gerrit.named-data.net/%23/c/ndn-cxx/%2B/4876/&sa=D&ust=1541001603160000>
>> Implementation detail, to test or not to test?
>> 
>> 
>> https://lists.netsec.colostate.edu/mailman/private/operators/2018-October/001311.html <https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.netsec.colostate.edu/mailman/private/operators/2018-October/001311.html&sa=D&ust=1541001603161000>
>> How should NDN-FCH react to node failures?
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nfd-dev mailing list
>> Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu <mailto:Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu>
>> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/nfd-dev/attachments/20181031/135a6923/attachment.html>