[Nfd-dev] What link object to use on testbed?

[Lixia Zhang]

> On Aug 18, 2017, at 6:10 AM, Junxiao Shi <shijunxiao at email.arizona.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi Haitao
> 
> Link object in Interest has been replaced by forwarding hint. However, your question still applies when forwarding hint is used.
> 
> 
> I tried to send an Interest with link object to the testbed, but the producer didn't receive the interest. Could you help to see what is wrong with my link object?
> 
> Here is what I did:
> (1) The producer registers prefix /org/openmhealth/<user-id> on ucla router (spurs.cs.ucla.edu <http://spurs.cs.ucla.edu/>)
> (2) A consumer connecting to remap router (128.97.98.7) sends an interest with prefix /org/openmhealth/<user-id>, and with link object. The link object has name  /org/openmhealth/<user-id>, and a delegation /ndn/edu/ucla(it is ucla router's routable prefix), and it is signed by a cert /org/openmhealth/KEY/<user-id>/...., which is signed by ndnfit trust anchor, a second trust anchor on the testbed.
> 
> 
> REMAP router is configured <https://github.com/WU-ARL/NDN_Ansible/blob/138020756db384222e62802baeaca0b6a090c6d7/host_vars/REMAP <https://github.com/WU-ARL/NDN_Ansible/blob/138020756db384222e62802baeaca0b6a090c6d7/host_vars/REMAP>> to have network region name /ndn/edu/ucla/remap.

I do not know what have been defined as the rules for configuring so called "region"; in this specific case the outcome does not sound correct -- REMAP router should remove forwarding hint only if 
the forwarding hint = /ndn/edu/ucla/remap.

Lixia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/nfd-dev/attachments/20170818/23a55518/attachment.html>