[Nfd-dev] Fwd: Code Coverage Percentage

Davide Pesavento davide.pesavento at lip6.fr
Sat Apr 9 08:23:41 PDT 2016


I'm not sure I understand the question (or maybe I'm missing some
context)... difference from what to what? between one commit and the
next one?

Also, when you say "code coverage", what kind of coverage
(classes/lines/conditionals/...) are you talking about?

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Junxiao Shi
<shijunxiao at email.arizona.edu> wrote:
> As decided in 20140114 NFD meeting, code coverage is supposed to be over
> 90%.
> But does anyone know the policy on "difference of code coverage"?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Eric Newberry" <enewberry at email.arizona.edu>
> Date: Apr 8, 2016 15:53
> Subject: Code Coverage Percentage
> To: "Junxiao Shi" <shijunxiao at email.arizona.edu>
> Cc:
>
>> From your experience with code coverage in NDN, what would you consider to
>> be a significant difference in code coverage, percentage wise? 5%? 10%? I
>> wrote a script to output files where the coverage percentage differs by more
>> than a certain amount.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> --
>> Eric Newberry
>>
>> Computer Science Undergraduate
>> The University of Arizona
>> Vice President, University of Arizona ACM Student Chapter
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nfd-dev mailing list
> Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu
> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev
>



More information about the Nfd-dev mailing list