[Nfd-dev] [Operators] Spurious traffic to CSU/BYU hubs?
Lan Wang (lanwang)
lanwang at memphis.edu
Sun Mar 29 13:56:49 PDT 2015
Jeff,
Can you give a little more information?
- name prefix used by the ndncon producer?
- strategy used by the name prefix?
- was the spurious traffic present before the test?
Lan
On Mar 29, 2015, at 11:09 AM, "Burke, Jeff" <jburke at remap.ucla.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On ndnmap I am consistently seeing spurious traffic to the CSU hub. Can
> someone explain why?
>
> Steps to reproduce:
>
> - Start ndncon publisher with route via REMAP node (ndnradio example
> emailed about earlier).
> - Start ndncon consumer with route via CAIDA or UA (haven't tried others
> though using CSU as the consumer hub works)
>
> Results on ndnmap:
>
> - See ~500-1000 kb/sec traffic bidirectional from consumer to publisher.
> (e.g., CAIDA-UCLA-REMAP or REMAP-UA)
> - But, also see 100-250 kb/sec traffic from REMAP-CSU, REMAP-BYU-CSU.
> (note that traffic is asymmetric)
>
> Screenshot attached for consumer via CAIDA hub case.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
> <Screenshot 2015-03-29 09.07.12.png>_______________________________________________
> Operators mailing list
> Operators at lists.named-data.net
> http://lists.named-data.net/mailman/listinfo/operators
More information about the Nfd-dev
mailing list