[Nfd-dev] [Operators] Spurious traffic to CSU/BYU hubs?

Lan Wang (lanwang) lanwang at memphis.edu
Sun Mar 29 13:56:49 PDT 2015


Jeff,

Can you give a little more information?

- name prefix used by the ndncon producer?

- strategy used by the name prefix?

- was the spurious traffic present before the test?


Lan

On Mar 29, 2015, at 11:09 AM, "Burke, Jeff" <jburke at remap.ucla.edu> wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> On ndnmap I am consistently seeing spurious traffic to the CSU hub. Can
> someone explain why?
> 
> Steps to reproduce:
> 
> - Start ndncon publisher with route via REMAP node (ndnradio example
> emailed about earlier).
> - Start ndncon consumer with route via CAIDA or UA (haven't tried others
> though using CSU as the consumer hub works)
> 
> Results on ndnmap:
> 
> - See ~500-1000 kb/sec traffic bidirectional from consumer to publisher.
> (e.g., CAIDA-UCLA-REMAP or REMAP-UA)
> - But, also see 100-250 kb/sec traffic  from REMAP-CSU, REMAP-BYU-CSU.
> (note that traffic is asymmetric)
> 
> Screenshot attached for consumer via CAIDA hub case.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jeff
> 
> <Screenshot 2015-03-29 09.07.12.png>_______________________________________________
> Operators mailing list
> Operators at lists.named-data.net
> http://lists.named-data.net/mailman/listinfo/operators





More information about the Nfd-dev mailing list