[Nfd-dev] About our packet format spec

[Burke, Jeff]

+1 to both

From: Junxiao Shi <shijunxiao at email.ARIZONA.EDU<mailto:shijunxiao at email.ARIZONA.EDU>>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:42:18 -0700
To: Alex Afanasyev <alexander.afanasyev at ucla.edu<mailto:alexander.afanasyev at ucla.edu>>
Cc: "<nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu<mailto:nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu>>" <nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu<mailto:nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu>>
Subject: Re: [Nfd-dev] About our packet format spec

Dear folks

I suggest moving "comparison to CCNx 0.7 format" to a separate document, and publish that as a technical report.
NDN-TLV spec itself doesn't need this comparison.

Yours, Junxiao

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Alex Afanasyev <alexander.afanasyev at ucla.edu<mailto:alexander.afanasyev at ucla.edu>> wrote:
Hi,

The current definition of the format spec makes multiple references to the "old" format. These were relevant for version 0.1, but I think we no longer need to keep that conversation in the definition.

If there are no objections, I'm proposing to clean up spec, keeping only relevant packet spec definitions.

---
Alex

_______________________________________________
Nfd-dev mailing list
Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu<mailto:Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu>
http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev


_______________________________________________ Nfd-dev mailing list Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu<mailto:Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/nfd-dev/attachments/20150226/6594be19/attachment.html>