[Nfd-dev] config file process section

[Junxiao Shi]

Yes, upstart can obtain PID http://upstart.ubuntu.com/wiki/Stanzas#daemon
So we can omit "process" section.
On Mar 11, 2014 7:04 PM, "Alex Afanasyev" <alexander.afanasyev at ucla.edu>
wrote:

> Do we actually need this PID file section at all?  To my understanding,
> PID file is written by whatever system's start up mechanism, e.g., upstart
> in Ubuntu.
>
> ---
> Alex
>
> On Mar 11, 2014, at 7:00 PM, Junxiao Shi <shijunxiao at email.arizona.edu>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Steve
>
> I suggest adding a new free function (not a class method) as a handler of
> this section, which writes PID to a file.
>
> This could be part of task 1332.
>
> Yours, Junxiao
> On Mar 11, 2014 6:05 PM, "Steve DiBenedetto" <dibenede at cs.colostate.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The configuration file format (
>> http://redmine.named-data.net/projects/nfd/wiki/ConfigFileFormat)
>> defines a "process" with a "pidfile" field. As of this moment, I am not
>> aware of any module that handles this section. This is a problem because
>> issue 1332 (http://redmine.named-data.net/issues/1332) will enable
>> config file processing and will (correctly) generate an exception under
>> these circumstances.
>>
>> What module should use the "process" section and what issue should it
>> belong to?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steve
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nfd-dev mailing list
>> Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu
>> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Nfd-dev mailing list
> Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu
> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/nfd-dev/attachments/20140311/a4566e80/attachment.html>