[ndnSIM] forwarding strategies

Junxiao Shi shijunxiao at email.arizona.edu
Tue Dec 5 06:28:35 PST 2017


Hi Moussaoui

https://github.com/named-data-ndnSIM/ndnSIM/blob/b3241d2b0e5c4c7364c0af6453a90cc4bf7b9dc5/examples/ndn-simple-wifi.cpp#L35-L36
The topology consists of only two nodes. These strategies behave
equivalently when there is only one upstream.
To see a difference, add more producer nodes and setup FIB accordingly.

Yours, Junxiao

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 3:01 AM, moussaoui yehya <yehya.housseyn at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> i am  trying to run the ndn-simple-wifi.cc with various strategy(
> best-route, smart-flooding, flooding) and trace the metrics with l3tracer
> and Cs.tracer
>
> i have the same results in all strategies scenario and i do not understand
> where is the difference between strategies
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/ndnsim/attachments/20171205/ac92c1d4/attachment.html>


More information about the ndnSIM mailing list