[Ndn-interest] ASF overhead

Ashlesh Gawande (agawande) agawande at memphis.edu
Mon Jan 30 07:43:20 PST 2017

For the ASF strategy, what we did was to set the Nonce of ndnping to zero and count all non-zero Nonce as probing overhead for HR. Because there was no other way to distinguish between probe and ping as the interest is same.
You may also set the Nonce of the probe to some special value here instead of calling refreshNonce:

Just reposting from mini-ndn list as this might be better suited here.


From: Ndn-interest <ndn-interest-bounces at lists.cs.ucla.edu> on behalf of Nour El Houda Ben Youssef <NourElHouda.BenYoussef at wevioo.com>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 2:39:54 AM
To: ndn-interest at lists.cs.ucla.edu
Subject: [Ndn-interest] ASF overhead

Dear community

I was trying to evaluate overhead under various forwarding/ routing strategies in mini-ndn

with NLSR /best-route combination LSA/sync packets are used to compute overhead

with HR/ASF which packets are used to compute overhead, as ndndump files were analyzed no probing packets were found !

best regards


Nour El Houda BEN YOUSSEF KOUBÂA|Doctorante
Technopark El Ghazela 2088 Tunis- Tunisia
Phone: +216 31 34 00 14
Mobile: +216 40 01 73 56
Paris - Tunis - Dubai - Alger

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/ndn-interest/attachments/20170130/cd1329a3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4997 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/ndn-interest/attachments/20170130/cd1329a3/attachment.png>

More information about the Ndn-interest mailing list