[Ndn-interest] [Question] Why is TLV naming of content not popular?
zpymyyn at gmail.com
Fri Apr 28 12:01:03 PDT 2017
I was thinking why not using TLV to name content as well, since packet is already using it.
It seems scalable and flexible to me.
And then I found there is already one work for this back to 2012
"A TLV-structured data naming scheme for content-oriented networking”
But seems not lots of ppl paid attention which confused me.
Is there any weakness in this scheme?
More information about the Ndn-interest