[Ndn-interest] NDN protocol principles: no privacy?
Mark Stapp
mjs at cisco.com
Mon Mar 14 13:14:20 PDT 2016
ok, but - my suggestion is that the _default_ should be private, not
that there should not be a way for an application to _ask_ for non-private.
I'm hoping that the ongoing discussion will bring out some examples of
communication that folks think _belongs_ in-the-clear - where some
property of the application involved will be compromised if the
communication is strongly protected and confidential. I think that it's
going to be difficult to make much of a case there, given the
capabilities that well-designed applications offer in the current
internet, but it'd be interesting to hear the examples.
and ... I have to say that I don't understand the "principle of
universality", so ... I think that might be its own thread?
-- Mark
On 3/14/16 3:59 PM, Luca Muscariello wrote:
> Imposing that all communications must be private is in contradiction
> with the principle of universality as long as the network is supposed to
> carry any kind of application.
>
> So I disagree that privacy is a principle.
> Not all communications are private.
>
> Luca
>
>
More information about the Ndn-interest
mailing list