[Ndn-interest] NDN overhead

Nour El Houda Ben Youssef NourElHouda.BenYoussef at wevioo.com
Fri Jul 29 03:20:31 PDT 2016

Yes indeed I already checked this thread
Yet too many aspects still fuzzy

First of all, we know that each layer in the Internet protocol Suite causes its overhead which why we talk about control overhead, signaling overhead, etc
With  NDN Interest packets or nacks are considered as which overhead exactly

Second, as I tried to experiment NFD, I noticed that I’m able only to use NDN as an overlay network on top of udp or TCP… So for my overhead: would it be the Internet protocol suite overheads in addition to ndn overhead (interests and nacks)?

Best regards

De : Lixia Zhang [mailto:lixia at cs.ucla.edu]
Envoyé : mercredi 27 juillet 2016 12:39
À : Nour El Houda Ben Youssef
Cc : ndn-interest at lists.cs.ucla.edu
Objet : Re: [Ndn-interest] NDN overhead

On Jul 27, 2016, at 4:17 AM, Nour El Houda Ben Youssef <NourElHouda.BenYoussef at wevioo.com<mailto:NourElHouda.BenYoussef at wevioo.com>> wrote:

Dear ndn users

I would like to ask a pragmatic question

Can we talk about control overhead with ndn?

Can interest packets be considered as overhead since they are NOT data packets ?

wonder if you could check the mail archive (pointer below) -- we had a discussion on this topic not long along, under the subject line
    "How sending an interest for each chunk is justified?"

Best regards


Nour El Houda BEN YOUSSEF KOUBÂA|Doctorante
Technopark El Ghazela 2088 Tunis- Tunisia
Phone: +216 31 34 00 14
Mobile: +216 40 01 73 56
Paris – Tunis - Dubai – Alger

Ndn-interest mailing list
Ndn-interest at lists.cs.ucla.edu<mailto:Ndn-interest at lists.cs.ucla.edu>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/ndn-interest/attachments/20160729/4d4a5f69/attachment.html>

More information about the Ndn-interest mailing list