[Ndn-interest] any comments on naming convention?
mjs at cisco.com
Mon Sep 15 07:55:30 PDT 2014
hmm - is this really "just some questions", some personal curiosity? or
is it a broader invitation to the community to dig into what's been
presented in v1 of the TR, with a view to developing the next version?
just to be clear: I do not like the 'naming conventions', I see them as
a hangover from the bad old days. Since my "application" is mainly
infrastructure, the conventions do not meet my needs. I don't think we
can rely on use of magic values in allegedly-opaque name component data,
and hope for the best. I think we do need to have typed name components
so that we have clear places to carry special kinds of name information,
like segment number and version, in a way that is unambiguous.
On 9/14/14 11:39 PM, Tai-Lin Chu wrote:
> Just some questions to know how people feel about it.
> 1. Do you like it or not? why?
> 2. Does it fit the need of your application?
> 3. What might be some possible changes (or even a big redesign) if you
> are asked to purpose a naming convention?
> 4. some other thoughts
> Feel free to answer any of the questions.
>  http://named-data.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ndn-tr-22-ndn-memo-naming-conventions.pdf
> Ndn-interest mailing list
> Ndn-interest at lists.cs.ucla.edu
More information about the Ndn-interest