<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">Given the amount of code we have, I would suggest we keep both notations as allowed.</div><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Oct 30, 2014, at 2:49 PM, Junxiao Shi <<a href="mailto:shijunxiao@email.arizona.edu" class="">shijunxiao@email.arizona.edu</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><p class="">Dear folks</p><p class="">rule 3.20 states: 0 should be used instead of NULL.</p><p class="">In C++ 11, a null pointer is typically written as std::nullptr.<br class="">
Usage of std::nullptr is already permitted, because it doesn't violate this rule.</p><p class="">Should we amend this rule as follows?<br class="">
"std::nullptr" should be used to represent null pointer.</p><p class="">Yours, Junxiao</p>
_______________________________________________<br class="">Nfd-dev mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Nfd-dev@lists.cs.ucla.edu" class="">Nfd-dev@lists.cs.ucla.edu</a><br class="">http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>