[Nfd-dev] repo-ng compilation problem
Gusev, Peter
peter at remap.ucla.edu
Wed Oct 18 14:00:53 PDT 2017
Thank you, Nick!
It compiles now.
Would this<https://redmine.named-data.net/projects/repo-ng/wiki/Repo_Protocol_Specification> be a good pointer to get familiar with how to use repo-ng?
Thanks,
--
Peter Gusev
peter at remap.ucla.edu<mailto:peter at remap.ucla.edu>
+1 213 5872748
Research Scholar @ REMAP UCLA<http://remap.ucla.edu/>
Video streaming/ICN networks/Creative Development
On Oct 18, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Nick Gordon <nmgordon at memphis.edu<mailto:nmgordon at memphis.edu>> wrote:
Peter,
It looks like the last commit that has only v1 security code is 42290b2b12b06ccbb028f04367f016f924f213e3, but I haven't done any work with it under v1. Probably that commit will work with any pre-v2 version of NFD and ndn-cxx, but I can't be sure.
-Nick
On 10/18/17 15:38, Gusev, Peter wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
Is there a commit I can rollback to, in order to use 0.5.1 version of the library and NFD?
I’d rather don’t mess with our existing setup by updating to the latest version, as it may cause troubles with other software using it.
Thanks,
--
Peter Gusev
peter at remap.ucla.edu<mailto:peter at remap.ucla.edu>
+1 213 5872748
Research Scholar @ REMAP UCLA<http://remap.ucla.edu/>
Video streaming/ICN networks/Creative Development
On Oct 18, 2017, at 12:06 PM, Nick Gordon <nmgordon at memphis.edu<mailto:nmgordon at memphis.edu>> wrote:
Peter,
I agree with Eric, I think that's the problem. I was recently doing some work on repo-ng, and I had to compile against newer versions of ndn-cxx. In order to clear everything out, I removed all the includes that ndn-cxx installs (for me they were in /usr/local/include/ndn-cxx) and then compiled ndn-cxx again. I've had issues of the old headers still conflicting in some ways if you don't delete all the headers from the v1 refs of ndn-cxx.
-Nick
On 10/18/17 13:50, Eric Newberry wrote:
Hi Peter,
Have you attempted compiling it against release 0.6.0? It looks like repo-ng is using version 2 of the security API, which I believe was released with 0.6.0.
Eric
On Oct 18, 2017 11:42 AM, "Gusev, Peter" <peter at remap.ucla.edu<mailto:peter at remap.ucla.edu>> wrote:
hi there,
trying to build repo-ng, have NFD 0.5.1 and ndn-cxx 0.5.1 installed:
../src/repo.cpp: In constructor ‘repo::Repo::Repo(boost::asio::io_service&, const repo::RepoConfig&)’:
../src/repo.cpp:126:53: error: no matching function for call to ‘repo::WriteHandle::WriteHandle(ndn::Face&, repo::RepoStorage&, ndn::security::v2::KeyChain&, ndn::util::scheduler::Scheduler&, ndn::security::ValidatorConfig&)’
, m_tcpBulkInsertHandle(ioService, m_storageHandle)
^
In file included from ../src/repo.hpp:28:0,
from ../src/repo.cpp:20:
../src/handles/write-handle.hpp:70:3: note: candidate: repo::WriteHandle::WriteHandle(ndn::Face&, repo::RepoStorage&, ndn::security::v2::KeyChain&, ndn::util::scheduler::Scheduler&, ndn::security::v2::Validator&)
WriteHandle(Face& face, RepoStorage& storageHandle, KeyChain& keyChain,
^
../src/handles/write-handle.hpp:70:3: note: no known conversion for argument 5 from ‘ndn::security::ValidatorConfig’ to ‘ndn::security::v2::Validator&’
../src/repo.cpp:126:53: error: no matching function for call to ‘repo::WatchHandle::WatchHandle(ndn::Face&, repo::RepoStorage&, ndn::security::v2::KeyChain&, ndn::util::scheduler::Scheduler&, ndn::security::ValidatorConfig&)’
, m_tcpBulkInsertHandle(ioService, m_storageHandle)
^
In file included from ../src/repo.hpp:29:0,
from ../src/repo.cpp:20:
../src/handles/watch-handle.hpp:57:3: note: candidate: repo::WatchHandle::WatchHandle(ndn::Face&, repo::RepoStorage&, ndn::security::v2::KeyChain&, ndn::util::scheduler::Scheduler&, ndn::security::v2::Validator&)
WatchHandle(Face& face, RepoStorage& storageHandle, KeyChain& keyChain,
^
../src/handles/watch-handle.hpp:57:3: note: no known conversion for argument 5 from ‘ndn::security::ValidatorConfig’ to ‘ndn::security::v2::Validator&’
../src/repo.cpp:126:53: error: no matching function for call to ‘repo::DeleteHandle::DeleteHandle(ndn::Face&, repo::RepoStorage&, ndn::security::v2::KeyChain&, ndn::util::scheduler::Scheduler&, ndn::security::ValidatorConfig&)’
, m_tcpBulkInsertHandle(ioService, m_storageHandle)
^
In file included from ../src/repo.hpp:30:0,
from ../src/repo.cpp:20:
../src/handles/delete-handle.hpp:42:3: note: candidate: repo::DeleteHandle::DeleteHandle(ndn::Face&, repo::RepoStorage&, ndn::security::v2::KeyChain&, ndn::util::scheduler::Scheduler&, ndn::security::v2::Validator&)
DeleteHandle(Face& face, RepoStorage& storageHandle, KeyChain& keyChain,
^
../src/handles/delete-handle.hpp:42:3: note: no known conversion for argument 5 from ‘ndn::security::ValidatorConfig’ to ‘ndn::security::v2::Validator&’
Waf: Leaving directory `/home/peter/repo-ng/build'
Build failed
-> task in 'ndn-repo-objects' failed (exit status 1):
{task 140519176988496: cxx repo.cpp -> repo.cpp.1.o}
['/usr/bin/g++', '-O2', '-g', '-pedantic', '-Wall', '-Wextra', '-Wnon-virtual-dtor', '-Wno-unused-parameter', '-fdiagnostics-color', '-std=c++11', '-pthread', '-pthread', '-I/home/peter/repo-ng/build/src', '-I/home/peter/repo-ng/src', '-I/usr/local/include', '-I/usr/include', '-DNDEBUG', '-DHAVE_NDN_CXX=1', '-DHAVE_SQLITE3=1', '../src/repo.cpp', '-c', '-o', '/home/peter/repo-ng/build/src/repo.cpp.1.o']
Do I need to use older versions of the library/NFD?
Thanks,
--
Peter Gusev
peter at remap.ucla.edu<mailto:peter at remap.ucla.edu>
+1 213 5872748<tel:%28213%29%20587-2748>
Research Scholar @ REMAP UCLA<http://remap.ucla.edu/>
Video streaming/ICN networks/Creative Development
_______________________________________________
Nfd-dev mailing list
Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu<mailto:Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu>
http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev
_______________________________________________
Nfd-dev mailing list
Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu<mailto:Nfd-dev at lists.cs.ucla.edu>
http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/nfd-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/nfd-dev/attachments/20171018/19250f09/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Nfd-dev
mailing list