[Nfd-dev] semantics of Transport::pause

[Junxiao Shi]

Hi Davide

TcpTransport and UnixTransport never need to send periodic keep-alive.

Yours, Junxiao

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Davide Pesavento <davide.pesavento at lip6.fr>
wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Alex Afanasyev <afanasev at cs.ucla.edu>
> wrote:
> > On pause, all pending io_service tasks (e.g., for asynchronous waiting
> for
> > incoming data) need to be cancelled (but socket should be kept in open
> > state)
>
> What if the underlying transport mechanism needs to send periodic
> keep-alive packets in order to maintain the connection? (Or am I
> misunderstanding what you mean by keeping the socket "in open state"?)
>
> Thanks,
> Davide
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/nfd-dev/attachments/20150119/c9d4a49b/attachment.html>