[Nfd-dev] size_t vs std::size_t

[Davide Pesavento]

Hi Junxiao,

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Junxiao Shi
<shijunxiao at email.arizona.edu> wrote:
> Dear folks
>
> Since both are the same type, we should use a consistent name for it,
> regardless of whether a function is a callback of Boost.Asio (which is not
> obvious).

I agree completely.

>
> Therefore, the proposal is:
>
> * in common.hpp, include cstddef
> * in common.hpp, using std::size_t
> * write size_t everywhere

+1

Thanks,
Davide