<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=unicode" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 11.00.10586.162"></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText48739 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr>Hi Hassan,</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>I don't see why it's not possible. If Node50 receives interest on wifi face(WifiNetDevice), it can answer regardless of knowing who has requested on that face.</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>Thanks,</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>Sabet<BR></DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>---------- Forwarded message ----------<BR>From: <B class=gmail_sendername>Hassan Sinky</B> <SPAN dir=ltr><<A href="mailto:sinkyh@oregonstate.edu">sinkyh@oregonstate.edu</A>></SPAN><BR>Date: Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 7:04 AM<BR>Subject: Re: [ndnSIM] Wifi and p2p links on a single node.<BR>To: <A href="mailto:ndnsim@lists.cs.ucla.edu">ndnsim@lists.cs.ucla.edu</A><BR><BR><BR>
<DIV dir=ltr>Actually I'd like to revise my previous message. This topology works fine, however, the only issue is if I add a WiFi net device to "Node50" for when "Node52" associates with "Node50" data should be delivered to "Node52" via WiFi. Is this possible?</DIV>
<DIV class=HOEnZb>
<DIV class=h5>
<DIV class=gmail_extra><BR>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Hassan Sinky <SPAN dir=ltr><<A href="mailto:sinkyh@oregonstate.edu" target=_blank>sinkyh@oregonstate.edu</A>></SPAN> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex">
<DIV dir=ltr>Hello everyone,
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>I have the following topology:<IMG alt="Inline image 2" src="https://webmail.sbu.ac.ir/Exchange/M.AbdollahiSabet/Drafts/image.png" width=544 height=283></DIV>
<DIV>"Node51" and "Node52" are connected via WiFi. Whereas "Node51" and "Node50" are connected via a p2p link. "Node50" is the producer. For some reason when node "Node52" requests data from the producer "Node50" does not respond. However, if I make "Node51" the producer the content is delivered without issue. Does ndnsim not support this particular multihop scenario? If so, is there a workaround to this as it seems like a very basic and practical scenario for NDN. Any help would be greatly appreciated.</DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></DIV><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>ndnSIM mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:ndnSIM@lists.cs.ucla.edu">ndnSIM@lists.cs.ucla.edu</A><BR><A href="http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/ndnsim" rel=noreferrer target=_blank>http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/ndnsim</A><BR><BR></DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>