<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body><div><div style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;">Hi Matteo<br><br>ndnpingserver needs to be running on node B. Otherwise, NFD on node B will return Nack-NoRoute because /ndn/edu/b/ping doesn't match any FIB entry.<br><br>Start ndnpingserver with this command:<br>b ndnpingserver /ndn/edu/b &<br><br>Yours, Junxiao</div></div><div dir="ltr"><hr><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">From: </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="mailto:Matteo.Bertolino@eurecom.fr">Matteo Bertolino</a></span><br><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">Sent: </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;">9/6/2016 4:49</span><br><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">To: </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="mailto:ndn-interest@lists.cs.ucla.edu">ndn-interest@lists.cs.ucla.edu</a></span><br><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">Subject: </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;">[Ndn-interest] miniNDN: nack, no route</span><br><br></div>Good morning NDN community,<br>I choose miniNDN to begin my experience, but surely for my poor use of <br>the tool, I am obtaining unexpected results.<br>I launched the program already written pingAll in a my personal <br>topology composed by two nodes connected by a link.<br><br>It is a simple scenario, but I have the same following problem with <br>the default topology: all the requests are nacked. For example:<br>PING /ndn/edu/b<br>20160906T113355.728806 - nack from /ndn/edu/b: seq=7022016325669868656 <br>time=25.3841 ms reason=NoRoute<br>[...]<br>10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 10 nacked, 0% packet loss, 100% <br>nacked, time 0 ms<br><br>NLSR converged successfully, and the FIB table of A and B seems ok. <br>However I wrote them below.<br><br>mininet> a nfd-status -b<br>FIB:<br> /ndn/NLSR/sync nexthops={faceid=257 (cost=0), faceid=260 (cost=10)}<br> /localhost/nfd/rib nexthops={faceid=256 (cost=0)}<br> /ndn/NLSR/LSA nexthops={faceid=260 (cost=10)}<br> /ndn/broadcast/KEYS nexthops={faceid=257 (cost=0), faceid=260 (cost=10)}<br> /ndn/NLSR/LSA/edu/%C1.Router/cs/a nexthops={faceid=257 (cost=0)}<br> /ndn/edu/%C1.Router/cs/b nexthops={faceid=260 (cost=10)}<br> /localhost/nfd nexthops={faceid=1 (cost=0)}<br> /ndn/edu/b nexthops={faceid=260 (cost=10)}<br> /localhost/nlsr nexthops={faceid=257 (cost=0)}<br> /ndn/edu/%C1.Router/cs/a nexthops={faceid=257 (cost=0)}<br><br><br>mininet> b nfd-status -b<br>FIB:<br> /ndn/NLSR/sync nexthops={faceid=257 (cost=0), faceid=260 (cost=10)}<br> /localhost/nfd/rib nexthops={faceid=256 (cost=0)}<br> /ndn/NLSR/LSA nexthops={faceid=260 (cost=10)}<br> /ndn/broadcast/KEYS nexthops={faceid=257 (cost=0), faceid=260 (cost=10)}<br> /ndn/edu/%C1.Router/cs/b nexthops={faceid=257 (cost=0)}<br> /ndn/edu/a nexthops={faceid=260 (cost=10)}<br> /localhost/nfd nexthops={faceid=1 (cost=0)}<br> /localhost/nlsr nexthops={faceid=257 (cost=0)}<br> /ndn/edu/%C1.Router/cs/a nexthops={faceid=260 (cost=10)}<br> /ndn/NLSR/LSA/edu/%C1.Router/cs/b nexthops={faceid=257 (cost=0)}<br><br>Any ideas? Thank you very much<br><br>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>This message was sent using EURECOM Webmail: http://webmail.eurecom.fr<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Ndn-interest mailing list<br>Ndn-interest@lists.cs.ucla.edu<br>http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/ndn-interest<br></body></html>