<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
I disagree with the categorical statement below. Hop-by-hop<br>
fragmentation is indeed an option for NDN, but it's *not* the only
one.<br>
One way to do secure cut-through (end-based and intermediate) <br>
(re-)fragmentation is described here:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2861">http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2861</a><br>
<br>
Gene<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/29/15 5:23 PM, Alex Afanasyev
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:3A413472-999D-4F6F-B6BB-2C8631FB7042@ucla.edu"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" class=""><font size="2">....</font>
<div class="">
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space;
-webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">maybe a typo?</div>
<div class="">that ought to be/really means “hop-by-hop
fragmentation and reassembly”</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>yes. this is a typo that we didn’t catch before. The
conclusion meant to highlight that *hop-by-hop* fragmentation
is the only viable option for NDN.</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
—</div>
<div>A<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>