[Ndn-interest] ndn replication strategy

[Ibrahim ABDULLAHI]

As replied

On Sep 29, 2016 7:57 PM, "Ibrahim ABDULLAHI" <ibrojay01 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Move Copy Down. Even thou it can be thought of in another perspective due
> to its plus in carefully reducing the amount of redundant or replica
> content cache.
>
> All the best
>
> On Sep 29, 2016 7:32 PM, "Nour El Houda Ben Youssef" <
> NourElHouda.BenYoussef at wevioo.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for your reply
>>
>> what do you exactly mean by MCD?
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>
>>
>> *De :* Ibrahim ABDULLAHI [mailto:ibrojay01 at gmail.com]
>> *Envoyé :* jeudi 29 septembre 2016 12:06
>> *À :* Nour El Houda Ben Youssef
>> *Cc :* ndn-interest at lists.cs.ucla.edu
>> *Objet :* Re: [Ndn-interest] ndn replication strategy
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Nour,
>> Yes LCE could be one of the strategies for the cache nature of NDN.
>> However, it all depends on the deployment particularly the network setting.
>> MCD, ProbCache are all good options.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 29, 2016 5:40 PM, "Nour El Houda Ben Youssef" <
>> NourElHouda.BenYoussef at wevioo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear ndn users,
>>
>>
>>
>> I was wondering which replication strategy does ndn use?
>>
>>
>>
>> Since a copy of content is stored along the path, can it be considered as
>> LCE (leave copy everywhere) strategy ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ndn-interest mailing list
>> Ndn-interest at lists.cs.ucla.edu
>> http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/mailman/listinfo/ndn-interest
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/ndn-interest/attachments/20160929/21a458a8/attachment.html>